← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BEMENT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6000522 · 1 · MAVERICK DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1903-06-01166th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MUD LAKE PIPELINE (1902-07-15). Immediately behind: HOUSE FLOOD WASTE (1903-06-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19509.01903-06-011911-06-03 0.420.0 CIRR 105
46751.195091903-06-011978-12-31 0.250.0 CSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 48 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 75 AF — 156% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 93 12th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 103 1.4
2011 85 11th lowest of 15 · 177% of median 157 0.9
2012 48 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 55 0.8
2013 2 1st lowest of 15 · 4% of median 58 0.2
2014 48 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 74 1.0
2015 65 9th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 110 0.6
2016 98 13th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 129 1.3
2017 14 5th lowest of 15 · 29% of median 47 0.4
2018 3 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 27 0.2
2019 113 14th lowest of 15 · 235% of median 105 2.0
2020 3 2nd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 27 0.1
2021 4 4th lowest of 15 · 8% of median 21 0.2
2022 16 6th lowest of 15 · 33% of median 37 0.4
2023 140 15th lowest of 15 · 292% of median 119 2.0
2024 75 10th lowest of 15 · 156% of median 109 2.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.