Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DANIELS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6000572 · 1 · SOUTH FORK SAN MIGUEL RI · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1896-07-31 — 140th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WADDELL DITCH (1897-05-05). Immediately behind: PRIESTLY DITCH NO 1 (1897-08-25).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17329.17014 | 1896-07-31 | 1911-06-03 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 78 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 25 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 449 AF — 1796% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 27 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 57 | 0.2 |
| 1992 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1993 | 69 | 11th lowest of 15 · 276% of median | 73 | 0.5 |
| 1994 | 22 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 49 | 0.2 |
| 1995 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1996 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1997 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 1998 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1999 | 28 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 62 | 0.2 |
| 2000 | 21 | 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 72 | 0.2 |
| 2001 | 25 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 77 | 0.2 |
| 2007 | 648 | 15th lowest of 15 · 2592% of median | 109 | 3.9 |
| 2008 | 260 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1040% of median | 165 | 0.8 |
| 2009 | 236 | 12th lowest of 15 · 944% of median | 186 | 1.5 |
| 2010 | 449 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1796% of median | 55 | 8.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.