Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ILIUM DOM WATER PL

Structure dossier · WDID 6000644 · 7 · SOUTH FORK SAN MIGUEL RI · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1912-06-05 — 953rd most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: AMES DOMESTIC WATER S L (1912-06-05). Immediately behind: TROUT LAKE DOM WATER S L (1912-06-05).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37446.228011912-06-051967-01-16 0.1670.0 CSTOFIRDOM 475

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 32 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 32 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1986 34 12th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 167 0.2
1987 29 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 365 0.1
1988 32 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 366 0.1
1989 42 15th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 365 0.1
1990 33 11th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 365 0.1
1991 24 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 365 0.1
1992 41 14th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 366 0.1
1993 36 13th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 365 0.1
1994 32 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 365 0.1
1995 24 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 365 0.1
1996 19 3rd lowest of 15 · 59% of median 366 0.0
1997 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 304 0.1
1998 23 4th lowest of 15 · 72% of median 304 0.1
2000 2 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median 61 0.0
2001 32 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 304 0.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.