← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MORGAN NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6000702 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1956-09-251024th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MORGAN NO 1 DITCH (1956-09-25). Immediately behind: SWYHART DITCH NO 2 (1956-09-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
43829.389841956-09-251970-12-31 4.00.0 CIRRDOM

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 46 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 357 AF — 776% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1987 48 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 50 0.5
1988 30 3rd lowest of 15 · 65% of median 87 0.2
1989 39 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 65 0.5
1990 76 11th lowest of 15 · 165% of median 96 0.5
1991 14 1st lowest of 15 · 30% of median 28 0.5
1992 69 10th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 137 0.5
1993 46 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 71 0.5
1994 17 2nd lowest of 15 · 37% of median 39 0.2
1995 120 12th lowest of 15 · 261% of median 87 1.0
1996 36 4th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 57 0.5
1997 39 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 63 0.5
1998 37 5th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 83 0.5
1999 557 15th lowest of 15 · 1211% of median 184 3.0
2000 326 13th lowest of 15 · 709% of median 161 2.5
2001 357 14th lowest of 15 · 776% of median 91 2.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.