← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PARKWAY DITCH NEW

Structure dossier · WDID 6000717 · 1 · SAN MIGUEL RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-07-01130th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DOING DITCH (1896-07-01). Immediately behind: REED CHATFIELD DITCH (1896-07-01).

Decreed rights (5)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16984.01896-07-011911-06-03 0.00.0 CIRR 76
19266.01902-10-011911-06-03 0.00.0 CIRR 104
25826.242891916-07-021929-02-26 2.760.0 CIRR 192
30771.01934-04-011939-11-01 0.00.0 CIRR 329
31490.01936-03-201939-11-01 1.890.0 CIRR 343

Recorded use (last 6 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 444 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 383 AF — 86% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 6 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 957 6th lowest of 6 · 215% of median 155 4.5
1975 506 4th lowest of 6 · 114% of median 128 3.5
1988 75 2nd lowest of 6 · 17% of median 21 2.0
1989 714 5th lowest of 6 · 161% of median 181 2.0
2000 0 1st lowest of 6 · 0% of median 8 0.0
2024 383 3rd lowest of 6 · 86% of median 106 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 5 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 599 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 6% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.