Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NORTH FIELD DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6000720 · 1 · COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1960-03-01 — 1026th most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SWYHART DITCH NO 2 (1956-09-25). Immediately behind: DONALD WILLIAMS SP NO 2 (1967-01-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43829.40237 | 1960-03-01 | 1970-12-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 85 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 76 AF — 89% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 59 | 5th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 16 | 2.3 |
| 2011 | 221 | 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median | 105 | 3.0 |
| 2012 | 143 | 11th lowest of 15 · 168% of median | 44 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 159 | 13th lowest of 15 · 187% of median | 86 | 1.0 |
| 2014 | 56 | 4th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 45 | 1.1 |
| 2015 | 85 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 173 | 0.8 |
| 2016 | 95 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 54 | 1.0 |
| 2017 | 150 | 12th lowest of 15 · 176% of median | 67 | 2.1 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 258 | 15th lowest of 15 · 304% of median | 62 | 2.6 |
| 2020 | 34 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 53 | 0.4 |
| 2021 | 11 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 13% of median | 30 | 0.4 |
| 2022 | 96 | 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 53 | 1.2 |
| 2023 | 69 | 6th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 68 | 1.0 |
| 2024 | 76 | 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 60 | 1.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.