← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PROSPECT NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6000741 · 1 · SAN MIGUEL RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1889-07-01793rd most senior of the 2893 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MISSOURI DITCH (1889-07-01). Immediately behind: BENSON DITCH (1890-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30604.144271889-07-011939-11-01 1.250.0 CSTOIRRAUGEVPRCH 221

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 75 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 65 AF — 87% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1998 142 15th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 144 0.6
1999 116 14th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 140 0.5
2000 75 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 113 0.5
2013 81 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 121 0.7
2014 55 5th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 106 0.4
2015 103 13th lowest of 15 · 137% of median 144 0.9
2016 95 12th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 134 0.6
2017 18 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median 52 0.4
2018 25 2nd lowest of 15 · 33% of median 77 0.6
2019 33 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median 124 0.4
2020 58 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 101 0.5
2021 49 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 131 0.3
2022 89 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 163 0.3
2023 94 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 134 0.8
2024 65 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 165 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.