← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ANDERSON DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 6200504 · 1 · GUNNISON RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1908-05-01249th most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PRICE DITCH (1907-04-01). Immediately behind: ANDERSON DITCH NO 2 (1908-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
27585.213051908-05-011941-04-21 0.60.0 CIRR 265

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 60 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2016, came in at 527 AF — 871% of that, and 14th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 62 8th lowest of 14 · 102% of median 48 1.0
1975 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1976 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1986 100 12th lowest of 14 · 165% of median 49 1.5
1987 24 3rd lowest of 14 · 40% of median 15 1.0
1988 59 7th lowest of 14 · 98% of median 62 0.5
1989 96 11th lowest of 14 · 159% of median 55 1.0
1990 69 9th lowest of 14 · 114% of median 78 0.6
1991 38 5th lowest of 14 · 63% of median 43 0.5
2000 83 10th lowest of 14 · 137% of median 43 1.0
2013 33 4th lowest of 14 · 54% of median 39 0.5
2014 242 13th lowest of 14 · 400% of median 54 3.0
2015 45 6th lowest of 14 · 74% of median 38 1.0
2016 527 14th lowest of 14 · 871% of median 109 4.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 635 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 7% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2016 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.