← My Water · Print / save as PDF
FITZPATRICK D NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 6200601 · 1 · BURDECK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1900-06-01 — 234th most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FITZPATRICK D NO 1 (1900-06-01). Immediately behind: FRENCH DITCH NO 2 (1901-05-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27585.18414 | 1900-06-01 | 1941-04-21 | 2.1 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 231, 23D |
Recorded use (last 14 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 78 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 16 AF — 20% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 181 | 14th lowest of 14 · 232% of median | 74 | 1.2 |
| 1976 | 28 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 36% of median | 29 | 0.5 |
| 1977 | 62 | 6th lowest of 14 · 80% of median | 65 | 0.5 |
| 1978 | 121 | 12th lowest of 14 · 155% of median | 48 | 1.5 |
| 1979 | 114 | 11th lowest of 14 · 146% of median | 59 | 1.5 |
| 1980 | 113 | 10th lowest of 14 · 145% of median | 36 | 2.5 |
| 1981 | 143 | 13th lowest of 14 · 183% of median | 73 | 1.0 |
| 1982 | 99 | 9th lowest of 14 · 127% of median | 52 | 1.0 |
| 1983 | 83 | 8th lowest of 14 · 106% of median | 43 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 60 | 5th lowest of 14 · 77% of median | 31 | 1.0 |
| 1985 | 73 | 7th lowest of 14 · 94% of median | 40 | 1.0 |
| 1986 | 48 | 4th lowest of 14 · 62% of median | 34 | 1.0 |
| 1987 | 0 | 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2006 | 16 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 20% of median | 16 | 0.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.