Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
EATON GULCH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6200949 · 7 · LAKE FORK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1875-08-01 — 1st most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately behind: F S WILLIAM D NO 1 (1875-08-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9344.0 | 1875-08-01 | 1904-03-28 | 0.26 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 1 |
Recorded use (last 9 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2013, came in at 9 AF — 150% of that, and 6th lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 54 | 8th lowest of 9 · 900% of median | 131 | 0.3 |
| 1998 | 68 | 9th lowest of 9 · 1133% of median | 150 | 0.3 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | 30 | 7th lowest of 9 · 500% of median | 140 | 0.3 |
| 2009 | 3 | 3rd lowest of 9 · 50% of median | 55 | 0.0 |
| 2010 | 2 | 2nd lowest of 9 · 33% of median | 48 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | 4 | 4th lowest of 9 · 67% of median | 71 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | 6 | 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median | 95 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 9 | 6th lowest of 9 · 150% of median | 136 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.