Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
F S WILLIAM D NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 6200611 · 1 · FRIENDS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:37 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1875-08-15 — 2nd most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EATON GULCH DITCH (1875-08-01). Immediately behind: JOHN W ANDREWS DITCH (1876-05-30).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9358.0 | 1875-08-15 | 1904-03-28 | 0.71 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 2 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 127 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 131 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 104 | 0.7 |
| 2011 | 172 | 11th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 66 | 1.6 |
| 2012 | 120 | 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | 76 | 0.8 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 127 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 56 | 1.5 |
| 2015 | 274 | 13th lowest of 15 · 216% of median | 132 | 1.2 |
| 2017 | 63 | 5th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 120 | 0.4 |
| 2018 | 143 | 10th lowest of 15 · 113% of median | 64 | 1.2 |
| 2019 | 364 | 15th lowest of 15 · 287% of median | 150 | 2.1 |
| 2020 | 187 | 12th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 65 | 1.5 |
| 2021 | 14 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 11% of median | 8 | 1.0 |
| 2022 | 287 | 14th lowest of 15 · 226% of median | 98 | 1.6 |
| 2023 | 17 | 4th lowest of 15 · 13% of median | 15 | 0.8 |
| 2024 | 127 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 63 | 1.2 |
| 2025 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.