← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

INDIAN CREEK NORTH DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6201000 · 1 · LAKE FORK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1903-07-01858th most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: POLE GULCH IRR DITCH (1902-06-01). Immediately behind: LOWER LAKE DITCH (1904-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44925.195391903-07-011973-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRSTKWLD

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 11 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 2 6th lowest of 15 · 18% of median 48 0.0
2011 3 7th lowest of 15 · 27% of median 74 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2014 45 10th lowest of 15 · 409% of median 37 1.5
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2017 29 9th lowest of 15 · 264% of median 43 0.5
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 293 15th lowest of 15 · 2664% of median 39 5.0
2020 56 11th lowest of 15 · 509% of median 36 0.8
2021 128 14th lowest of 15 · 1164% of median 71 1.8
2022 11 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 30 0.2
2023 107 12th lowest of 15 · 973% of median 126 1.5
2024 117 13th lowest of 15 · 1064% of median 150 1.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.