← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

YOUMANS WATER GULCH D

Structure dossier · WDID 6201190 · 1 · CEBOLLA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1925-06-01731st most senior of the 1980 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HIGHLANDS SPG & PONDS (1923-06-06). Immediately behind: BED GROUND SPG & PL (1925-06-19).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44559.275451925-06-011972-12-31 1.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 60 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2014, came in at 69 AF — 115% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1989 119 12th lowest of 15 · 198% of median 64 1.0
1990 163 15th lowest of 15 · 272% of median 83 1.0
1991 109 11th lowest of 15 · 182% of median 56 1.0
1992 137 14th lowest of 15 · 228% of median 70 1.0
1993 135 13th lowest of 15 · 225% of median 70 1.0
1994 60 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 47 1.1
1995 85 10th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 56 1.0
1996 56 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 30 1.0
2002 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2003 28 5th lowest of 15 · 47% of median 59 0.5
2004 54 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 77 0.7
2010 1 3rd lowest of 15 · 2% of median 29 0.0
2011 1 3rd lowest of 15 · 2% of median 46 0.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2014 69 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 73 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.