← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CHAMBERS CONDON RCHRG P 2
Structure dossier · WDID 6404404 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1976-04-03 — 1571st most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CHAMBERS CONDON RCHRG A (1976-04-03). Immediately behind: CHAMBERS CONDON RCHRG P 3 (1976-04-03).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46114.0 | 1976-04-03 | 1976-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | RCH | |
| 52960.52534 | 1993-10-31 | 1995-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | RCH | |
| 52960.52836 | 1994-08-29 | 1995-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | RCH | |
| 54360.0 | 1998-10-31 | 1998-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG |
Legal record & documents
6 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
98CW0475, 98CW0474, 95CW0053, W8460.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
98CW0475 | 1 | 1998-12-31 | S |
98CW0474 | 1 | 1995-12-31 | S |
95CW0053 | 3 | 1995-12-31 | S |
W8460 | 1 | 1976-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 3 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 649 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2012, came in at 649 AF — 100% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 3 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 388 | 1st lowest of 3 · 60% of median | 61 | 3.4 |
| 2011 | 1,024 | 3rd lowest of 3 · 158% of median | 183 | 3.3 |
| 2012 | 649 | 2nd lowest of 3 · 100% of median | 122 | 3.4 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 4 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 366 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.