← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ABTS WELL 1-7773-F

Structure dossier · WDID 6405091 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1897-02-10143rd most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LONG ISLAND DITCH (1897-02-10). Immediately behind: ABTS WELL 3-5602-F (1897-02-10).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21526.172081897-02-101913-06-11 0.00.0 CIRR
22532.01911-09-101972-12-31 2.2220.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 112 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 97 AF — 86% of that, and 4th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 129 8th lowest of 12 · 115% of median 71 2.1
2013 66 3rd lowest of 12 · 59% of median 29 1.5
2015 61 2nd lowest of 12 · 54% of median 21 2.0
2016 40 1st lowest of 12 · 36% of median 22 1.2
2017 97 4th lowest of 12 · 86% of median 48 1.7
2018 134 10th lowest of 12 · 119% of median 90 0.9
2019 120 7th lowest of 12 · 107% of median 63 1.2
2020 105 6th lowest of 12 · 93% of median 57 1.1
2021 132 9th lowest of 12 · 117% of median 57 1.8
2022 244 12th lowest of 12 · 217% of median 111 1.6
2023 144 11th lowest of 12 · 128% of median 68 1.4
2024 97 4th lowest of 12 · 86% of median 127 0.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 764 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 29% of the irrigation seasons in 2012-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.