← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MANUELLO WELL 1-20452-F

Structure dossier · WDID 6405861 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-03-1190th most senior of the 2052 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DESOTO BROS WELL 5-20451 (1895-03-11). Immediately behind: HARMONY DITCH 1 (1895-04-28).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16506.01895-03-111902-09-29 0.00.0 CIRR
45735.01975-03-211975-12-31 4.450.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 188 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 238 AF — 127% of that, and 12th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 144 5th lowest of 14 · 77% of median 89 1.6
2012 120 3rd lowest of 14 · 64% of median 66 1.9
2013 310 14th lowest of 14 · 165% of median 122 3.2
2014 116 2nd lowest of 14 · 62% of median 35 1.8
2015 194 9th lowest of 14 · 103% of median 72 2.5
2016 179 6th lowest of 14 · 95% of median 99 1.3
2017 193 8th lowest of 14 · 103% of median 101 1.1
2018 201 10th lowest of 14 · 107% of median 82 1.8
2019 137 4th lowest of 14 · 73% of median 51 1.8
2020 208 11th lowest of 14 · 111% of median 105 1.1
2021 183 7th lowest of 14 · 97% of median 59 3.1
2022 243 13th lowest of 14 · 129% of median 95 1.6
2023 104 1st lowest of 14 · 55% of median 39 1.6
2024 238 12th lowest of 14 · 127% of median 82 1.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1097 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 38% of the irrigation seasons in 2011-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.