← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GERALD VERHOEFF DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6700544 · 1 · LUBERS DRAINAGE DITCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1945-05-01452nd most senior of the 2116 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RALPH MASSAR DITCH (1941-04-01). Immediately behind: GERALD VERHOEFF RESERVOIR (1945-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
35301.348191945-05-011959-04-21 10.00.0 CIRR 103

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 551 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,195 AF — 580% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 457 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 149 16.3
2011 124 3rd lowest of 15 · 22% of median 31 6.6
2012 2 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.2
2013 42 2nd lowest of 15 · 8% of median 21 4.9
2015 177 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 52 5.6
2016 512 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 117 5.4
2017 1,694 12th lowest of 15 · 307% of median 239 9.9
2018 551 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 227 12.7
2019 546 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 334 13.4
2020 1,837 14th lowest of 15 · 333% of median 366 19.5
2021 949 9th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 357 20.8
2022 1,183 10th lowest of 15 · 215% of median 358 26.8
2023 1,584 11th lowest of 15 · 288% of median 365 94.4
2024 1,704 13th lowest of 15 · 309% of median 366 382.7
2025 3,195 15th lowest of 15 · 580% of median 304 564.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.