← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BUFFALO CANAL (DEADMAN)

Structure dossier · WDID 6700565 · 1 · DEADMAN DITCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:44 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-10-01113th most senior of the 2116 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUFFALO CANAL (BUFFALO) (1895-10-01). Immediately behind: GODLEY DITCH & RESERVOIR (1896-01-22).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21857.16711895-10-011918-10-14 135.00.0 CIRR 1918-6

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,522 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,765 AF — 70% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 3,281 8th lowest of 12 · 130% of median 220 13.2
2015 1,454 1st lowest of 12 · 58% of median 109 39.3
2016 4,721 9th lowest of 12 · 187% of median 232 42.7
2017 5,848 11th lowest of 12 · 232% of median 202 44.1
2018 6,049 12th lowest of 12 · 240% of median 306 27.9
2019 5,663 10th lowest of 12 · 224% of median 365 21.8
2020 2,663 7th lowest of 12 · 106% of median 366 10.5
2021 2,232 4th lowest of 12 · 88% of median 365 8.5
2022 1,621 2nd lowest of 12 · 64% of median 365 9.5
2023 2,306 5th lowest of 12 · 91% of median 365 13.7
2024 2,381 6th lowest of 12 · 94% of median 366 9.2
2025 1,765 3rd lowest of 12 · 70% of median 304 9.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3565 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2010-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.