← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FLOYD VERHOEFF NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 6700566 · 1 · DEADMAN DITCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1946-07-18455th most senior of the 2116 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAMAR WELL NO 4 (1945-08-21). Immediately behind: FLOYD VERHOEFF RESERVOIR (1946-07-18).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
35301.352621946-07-181959-04-21 7.00.0 CIRR 105

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 158 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 70 AF — 44% of that, and 7th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1969 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 4 0.0
1970 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 20 0.0
1972 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 4 0.0
1973 426 12th lowest of 14 · 270% of median 105 5.0
2008 585 13th lowest of 14 · 370% of median 60 5.0
2009 926 14th lowest of 14 · 586% of median 132 6.0
2010 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 9 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2016 285 9th lowest of 14 · 180% of median 60 3.5
2017 57 6th lowest of 14 · 36% of median 17 3.3
2018 246 8th lowest of 14 · 156% of median 68 7.0
2019 377 11th lowest of 14 · 239% of median 275 7.3
2020 299 10th lowest of 14 · 189% of median 305 10.1
2021 70 7th lowest of 14 · 44% of median 20 1.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.