← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FLOYD VERHOEFF NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 6700567 · 1 · DEADMAN DITCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1953-08-12709th most senior of the 2116 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HANAGAN WELL NO 2 (1953-07-03). Immediately behind: EADS WELL NO 7 (1953-08-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37844.01953-08-121959-04-21 10.00.0 CIRR 175

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 71 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 43 AF — 61% of that, and 4th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 764 12th lowest of 12 · 1076% of median 81 5.0
2009 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2010 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2016 45 5th lowest of 12 · 63% of median 16 8.4
2019 165 9th lowest of 12 · 232% of median 240 4.9
2020 216 10th lowest of 12 · 304% of median 305 6.4
2021 161 8th lowest of 12 · 227% of median 67 5.8
2022 67 6th lowest of 12 · 94% of median 28 4.0
2023 75 7th lowest of 12 · 106% of median 20 5.5
2024 376 11th lowest of 12 · 530% of median 47 8.6
2025 43 4th lowest of 12 · 61% of median 23 2.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 850 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 2008-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.