← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BURGER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6800513 · 1 · DALLAS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-06-01113th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: UPPER OWL CREEK DITCH (1884-05-20). Immediately behind: JOHNSON DITCH NO 79 (1884-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12571.01884-06-011897-05-15 1.00.0 CIRR 90

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 176 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 35 AF — 20% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 324 13th lowest of 15 · 184% of median 120 3.0
2012 132 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 121 2.1
2013 70 3rd lowest of 15 · 40% of median 52 0.9
2014 176 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 80 1.6
2015 390 14th lowest of 15 · 222% of median 103 4.3
2016 148 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 48 6.0
2017 207 9th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 87 2.3
2018 55 2nd lowest of 15 · 31% of median 26 1.6
2019 272 12th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 34 5.3
2020 100 4th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 82 1.5
2021 150 7th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 84 2.1
2022 212 10th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 117 2.9
2023 676 15th lowest of 15 · 384% of median 105 4.9
2024 258 11th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 69 3.5
2025 35 1st lowest of 15 · 20% of median 67 0.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.