← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HARRISON NO 1 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6800597 · 1 · DALLAS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1900-07-20328th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LONE PINE DITCH (1897-08-06). Immediately behind: HARRISON NO 2 DITCH (1900-07-20).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
40646.184631900-07-201971-09-13 4.50.0 CIRRDOMSTK 2, 3

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 179 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 736 AF — 411% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 292 11th lowest of 15 · 163% of median 70 4.6
2012 98 4th lowest of 15 · 55% of median 28 3.0
2013 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2014 131 5th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 38 2.5
2015 179 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 130 2.3
2016 202 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 76 2.5
2017 390 12th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 63 4.2
2018 21 2nd lowest of 15 · 12% of median 14 2.3
2019 179 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 64 3.0
2020 55 3rd lowest of 15 · 31% of median 41 2.8
2021 224 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 68 3.1
2022 172 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 70 2.6
2023 597 14th lowest of 15 · 334% of median 72 9.3
2024 398 13th lowest of 15 · 222% of median 89 3.4
2025 736 15th lowest of 15 · 411% of median 183 4.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2047 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 26% of the irrigation seasons in 1989-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.