← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HYDE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6800612 · 1 · UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1878-05-01237th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WEST PHILLIPS DITCH (1876-06-10). Immediately behind: STANTON SLOUGH DITCH (1878-05-13).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
29554.103481878-05-011942-05-11 3.00.0 CIRR 11

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 860 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 610 AF — 71% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 757 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 271 5.9
2012 347 1st lowest of 15 · 40% of median 185 5.0
2013 776 5th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 299 3.6
2014 809 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 365 4.5
2015 1,025 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 329 5.2
2016 657 3rd lowest of 15 · 76% of median 348 4.8
2017 974 11th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 352 6.1
2018 904 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 294 5.6
2019 1,141 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 365 7.9
2020 1,121 13th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 328 10.7
2021 860 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 340 6.1
2022 836 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 325 9.8
2023 1,856 15th lowest of 15 · 216% of median 286 14.7
2024 920 10th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 288 4.4
2025 610 2nd lowest of 15 · 71% of median 304 3.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.