Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HYDE SNEVA DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6800613 · 1 · DALLAS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1879-06-01 — 49th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHERBINO DITCH (1879-05-01). Immediately behind: LOG HILL PUMPING PLANT (1879-06-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10744.0 | 1879-06-01 | 1897-05-15 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 39 |
| 11232.0 | 1880-10-01 | 1897-05-15 | 2.6067 | 0.0 | C | STOIRR | 42 |
| 13270.0 | 1886-05-01 | 1897-05-15 | 8.096 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 100 |
| 29554.11232 | 1880-10-01 | 1942-05-11 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 17 |
| 54056.43006 | 1967-09-30 | 1998-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | STK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,006 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 998 AF — 99% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2,045 | 14th lowest of 15 · 203% of median | 144 | 12.2 |
| 2012 | 2,236 | 15th lowest of 15 · 222% of median | 174 | 12.0 |
| 2013 | 978 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 183 | 7.3 |
| 2014 | 519 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 136 | 5.9 |
| 2015 | 1,403 | 10th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 181 | 9.0 |
| 2016 | 834 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 168 | 13.9 |
| 2017 | 1,006 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 173 | 8.5 |
| 2018 | 1,589 | 13th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | 225 | 8.1 |
| 2019 | 856 | 4th lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 195 | 7.2 |
| 2020 | 1,472 | 11th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 265 | 6.9 |
| 2021 | 1,241 | 9th lowest of 15 · 123% of median | 284 | 10.9 |
| 2022 | 1,520 | 12th lowest of 15 · 151% of median | 155 | 13.9 |
| 2023 | 924 | 5th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 123 | 7.7 |
| 2024 | 410 | 1st lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 181 | 3.8 |
| 2025 | 998 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 166 | 11.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.