← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OWL CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 6800683 · 1 · COW CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:32 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-05-20110th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WHITE DITCH (1884-05-16). Immediately behind: STEALEY OWL CREEK DITCH (1884-05-20).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12559.01884-05-201897-05-15 5.8750.0 CIRR 86, 90
29554.125591884-05-201942-05-11 5.1250.0 CIRR 34
40646.258721920-11-011971-09-13 1.00.0 CDOMSTK 12

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 415 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 268 AF — 65% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,033 10th lowest of 15 · 249% of median 163 11.3
2012 1,286 13th lowest of 15 · 310% of median 211 6.6
2013 1,201 11th lowest of 15 · 289% of median 214 6.4
2014 1,838 15th lowest of 15 · 443% of median 297 12.4
2015 1,284 12th lowest of 15 · 309% of median 198 16.0
2016 1,362 14th lowest of 15 · 328% of median 235 10.4
2017 672 9th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 232 3.2
2018 262 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median 155 4.3
2019 259 1st lowest of 15 · 62% of median 82 2.9
2020 415 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 187 5.0
2021 296 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 151 2.5
2022 412 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 143 3.0
2023 404 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 162 3.7
2024 260 2nd lowest of 15 · 63% of median 174 2.6
2025 268 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 182 2.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.