Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
VON HAGEN DALLAS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 6800770 · 1 · DALLAS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1880-12-18 — 57th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BURKHART EDDY DITCH (1880-11-15). Immediately behind: NATE CREEK NO 1 DITCH (1881-03-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11310.0 | 1880-12-18 | 1897-05-15 | 11.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 43 |
| 46751.36676 | 1950-06-01 | 1978-12-31 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,339 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,339 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,501 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 114 | 14.1 |
| 2012 | 1,197 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 108 | 9.8 |
| 2013 | 762 | 1st lowest of 15 · 57% of median | 102 | 6.9 |
| 2014 | 991 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 132 | 10.0 |
| 2015 | 1,477 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 117 | 16.8 |
| 2016 | 2,012 | 14th lowest of 15 · 150% of median | 210 | 11.6 |
| 2017 | 2,558 | 15th lowest of 15 · 191% of median | 300 | 12.4 |
| 2018 | 1,182 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 265 | 3.7 |
| 2019 | 1,757 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 188 | 12.6 |
| 2020 | 1,210 | 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | 327 | 13.6 |
| 2021 | 1,074 | 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 312 | 7.0 |
| 2022 | 1,785 | 13th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 313 | 12.1 |
| 2023 | 1,359 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 75 | 12.3 |
| 2024 | 890 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 96 | 10.2 |
| 2025 | 1,339 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 194 | 11.9 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.