← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HYDROPLANT RIDGWAY RESERVOIR DAM

Structure dossier · WDID 6801369 · 9 · UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1956-11-06970th most senior of the 1293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BOUCHARD SPRING (1995-08-01). Immediately behind: SJR POND PARK DITCH ENL (1986-06-30).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
53325.390261956-11-061996-12-31 300.00.0 CPWR
60265.593062012-05-162015-12-31 275.8174.2 CPWR

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 23,352 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 35,370 AF — 152% of that, and 8th lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2017 287 1st lowest of 9 · 1% of median 61 35.3
2018 22,523 4th lowest of 9 · 96% of median 365 215.5
2019 23,352 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 335 316.1
2020 27,846 7th lowest of 9 · 119% of median 366 257.2
2021 17,760 2nd lowest of 9 · 76% of median 365 275.5
2022 19,956 3rd lowest of 9 · 86% of median 365 680.5
2023 40,780 9th lowest of 9 · 175% of median 365 365.5
2024 27,704 6th lowest of 9 · 119% of median 366 294.3
2025 35,370 8th lowest of 9 · 152% of median 304 251.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2892 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2017-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.