← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BURCH AND LONGWILL DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7100513 · 1 · DOLORES RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:55 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1880-04-15 — 6th most senior of the 279 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TOWN OF DOLORES PARK W (1879-05-31). Immediately behind: ILLINOIS DITCH (1880-04-15).
Decreed rights (7)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11063.0 | 1880-04-15 | 1882-02-01 | 0.7 | 0.0 | C | IRRINDAUGRCH | D-2 |
| 11443.0 | 1881-04-30 | 1892-02-01 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | D-7 |
| 11839.0 | 1882-05-31 | 1892-02-01 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRAUGRCH | D-12 |
| 15143.0 | 1891-06-17 | 1892-02-01 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | D-26 |
| 30667.11423 | 1881-04-10 | 1963-03-22 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 62-7 |
| 53325.53034 | 1995-03-15 | 1996-12-31 | 0.0 | 1.0 | C | FISRCH | |
| 59504.0 | 2012-11-30 | 2012-12-31 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | STORECFISFIRWLD |
Legal record & documents
14 decreed actions on record across
9 court cases:
23CW3022, 12CW0036, 21CW3027, CA0967, W0150, CA4102, CA0473, 96CW0005, 11CW0082.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
23CW3022 | 1 | 2012-12-31 | S |
12CW0036 | 3 | 2012-12-31 | O, S |
21CW3027 | 1 | 1996-12-31 | S |
CA0967 | 2 | 1963-03-22 | O, S |
W0150 | 1 | 1892-02-01 | O |
CA4102 | 1 | 1892-02-01 | O |
CA0473 | 3 | 1892-02-01 | O |
96CW0005 | 1 | 1882-02-01 | O |
11CW0082 | 1 | 1882-02-01 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,113 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 871 AF — 78% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 473 | 1st lowest of 15 · 42% of median | — | 132 | 2.8 |
| 2012 | 1,113 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 141 | 5.1 |
| 2013 | 1,659 | 13th lowest of 15 · 149% of median | 672 | 154 | 8.3 |
| 2014 | 1,455 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 644 | 238 | 8.2 |
| 2015 | 543 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 49% of median | 541 | 196 | 2.7 |
| 2016 | 1,127 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 618 | 199 | 6.8 |
| 2017 | 683 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 250 | 109 | 5.8 |
| 2018 | 1,854 | 15th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | 292 | 198 | 9.5 |
| 2019 | 1,693 | 14th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 114 | 148 | 23.1 |
| 2020 | 980 | 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 289 | 176 | 6.0 |
| 2021 | 1,106 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 227 | 156 | 7.3 |
| 2022 | 811 | 4th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 127 | 142 | 5.1 |
| 2023 | 1,139 | 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 504 | 147 | 10.0 |
| 2024 | 1,207 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 109 | 181 | 5.9 |
| 2025 | 871 | 5th lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 146 | 150 | 5.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 7 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 10747 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 67% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.