← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BIESER NO 1 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200535 · 1 · MESA CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1968-07-011005th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH CANYON SPG & PL 1 (1966-09-30). Immediately behind: DOBSON SPRING (1969-07-04).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
44925.432811968-07-011973-12-31 2.50.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 62 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 127 AF — 205% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 34 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 35 0.5
2010 53 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 54 0.5
2011 110 11th lowest of 15 · 177% of median 75 0.8
2012 15 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median 20 0.4
2013 18 2nd lowest of 15 · 29% of median 8 1.3
2014 40 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 28 0.8
2015 46 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 26 1.0
2016 202 14th lowest of 15 · 326% of median 80 1.5
2017 261 15th lowest of 15 · 421% of median 128 2.5
2019 108 10th lowest of 15 · 174% of median 95 1.5
2020 62 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 26 1.5
2021 65 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 43 1.6
2022 48 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 28 1.0
2023 162 13th lowest of 15 · 261% of median 50 3.4
2024 127 12th lowest of 15 · 205% of median 45 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1446 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 14% of the irrigation seasons in 1977-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.