← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOYLE CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200546 · 1 · BULL CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1914-08-23392nd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SEEPAGE WATER DITCH (1914-08-22). Immediately behind: ELIZABETH TURNER DITCH (1914-08-23).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30895.23611914-08-231941-07-25 0.60.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 61 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 42 AF — 69% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 39 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 28 1.1
1995 189 13th lowest of 15 · 310% of median 38 3.0
1996 61 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 42 1.0
1997 71 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 82 0.6
1998 95 11th lowest of 15 · 156% of median 76 1.0
1999 40 6th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 36 0.6
2000 11 3rd lowest of 15 · 18% of median 10 0.6
2001 5 2nd lowest of 15 · 8% of median 5 0.6
2014 212 14th lowest of 15 · 348% of median 142 2.0
2015 2 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 7 0.2
2018 69 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 76 0.5
2019 309 15th lowest of 15 · 507% of median 273 1.2
2020 107 12th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 107 0.6
2023 28 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median 150 0.4
2024 42 7th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 40 0.6

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2215 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 19% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.