← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FORD DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 7200621 · 1 · COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1920-04-15523rd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MCQUEARY RESERVOIR (1919-05-18). Immediately behind: HERRON DITCH A (1920-11-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
34419.256721920-04-151959-07-21 0.810.0 CIRRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 153 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 5 AF — 3% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 74 5th lowest of 15 · 48% of median 106 0.8
1995 362 9th lowest of 15 · 237% of median 212 1.0
1996 535 13th lowest of 15 · 350% of median 334 1.8
1997 510 12th lowest of 15 · 333% of median 356 1.0
1998 614 15th lowest of 15 · 401% of median 365 1.0
1999 484 11th lowest of 15 · 316% of median 357 0.8
2000 593 14th lowest of 15 · 388% of median 345 1.6
2001 417 10th lowest of 15 · 272% of median 265 1.4
2002 75 6th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 98 0.8
2003 15 2nd lowest of 15 · 10% of median 16 0.5
2015 87 7th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 52 2.5
2018 61 4th lowest of 15 · 40% of median 56 0.8
2019 153 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 205 0.9
2020 29 3rd lowest of 15 · 19% of median 38 0.5
2021 5 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 5 0.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.