Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JULIA KRUH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200735 · 1 · COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1914-08-05 — 378th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SUPERIOR DITCH (SMALLEY) (1914-08-02). Immediately behind: MCQUEARY SHOEMAKER D HG1 (1914-08-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30895.23592 | 1914-08-05 | 1941-07-25 | 0.26 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA5812.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA5812 | 1 | 1941-07-25 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 13 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 56 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2013, came in at 7 AF — 12% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | 101 | 12th lowest of 13 · 180% of median | 198 | 0.3 |
| 1979 | 95 | 11th lowest of 13 · 170% of median | 184 | 0.3 |
| 1984 | 63 | 8th lowest of 13 · 112% of median | 124 | 0.3 |
| 1985 | 93 | 10th lowest of 13 · 166% of median | 181 | 0.3 |
| 1987 | 129 | 13th lowest of 13 · 230% of median | 180 | 0.8 |
| 1999 | 14 | 3rd lowest of 13 · 25% of median | 29 | 0.3 |
| 2002 | 11 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 20% of median | 22 | 0.3 |
| 2008 | 15 | 4th lowest of 13 · 27% of median | 32 | 0.2 |
| 2009 | 37 | 6th lowest of 13 · 66% of median | 73 | 0.3 |
| 2010 | 76 | 9th lowest of 13 · 136% of median | 149 | 0.3 |
| 2011 | 56 | 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median | 110 | 0.3 |
| 2012 | 17 | 5th lowest of 13 · 30% of median | 34 | 0.3 |
| 2013 | 7 | 1st lowest of 13 · 12% of median | 15 | 0.3 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 13 recorded years (-2 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.044).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1331 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 18% of the irrigation seasons in 1978-2013 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.