← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MASON EDDY DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 7200766 · 1 · MESA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-11-30 — 10th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BOWEN DIVERSION POINT (1884-10-24). Immediately behind: GRAPEVINE DITCH (1885-01-13).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12753.0 | 1884-11-30 | 1890-02-07 | 4.032 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR | 42 |
| 30895.12724 | 1884-11-01 | 1941-07-25 | 1.95 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR | DOM7 |
| 30895.2426 | 1916-06-03 | 1941-07-25 | 0.74 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR | 427 |
| 32811.0 | 1939-11-01 | 1941-07-25 | 2.12 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR | 610 |
| 49637.0 | 1985-11-25 | 1985-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | AUG |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 762 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 659 AF — 86% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 27 | 1st lowest of 15 · 4% of median | — | 30 | 1.9 |
| 2011 | 1,427 | 14th lowest of 15 · 187% of median | — | 296 | 6.9 |
| 2012 | 1,492 | 15th lowest of 15 · 196% of median | — | 361 | 5.8 |
| 2013 | 1,154 | 13th lowest of 15 · 151% of median | — | 277 | 10.8 |
| 2014 | 677 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | — | 205 | 4.8 |
| 2015 | 472 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 41 | 365 | 3.8 |
| 2016 | 485 | 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | — | 366 | 8.0 |
| 2017 | 762 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 44 | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2018 | 856 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 73 | 365 | 5.5 |
| 2019 | 352 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | — | 365 | 4.0 |
| 2020 | 1,031 | 12th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | 93 | 366 | 6.0 |
| 2021 | 716 | 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median | — | 304 | 4.5 |
| 2022 | 767 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 81 | 118 | 5.0 |
| 2023 | 778 | 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 95 | 146 | 5.5 |
| 2024 | 659 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 122 | 124 | 5.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.