← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FREDERICK NO 2 D EXTENSION (BOYLE)

Structure dossier · WDID 7200957 · 1 · BULL CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1919-05-01441st most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HIGHTOWER DITCH (1918-06-11). Immediately behind: SPRING CREEK DITCH NO 1 (1919-05-17).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30895.253221919-05-011941-07-25 0.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 41 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 41 AF — 100% of that, and 6th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1970 83 8th lowest of 11 · 202% of median 32 2.1
1972 21 4th lowest of 11 · 51% of median 8 1.5
1997 127 9th lowest of 11 · 310% of median 40 2.0
1998 223 11th lowest of 11 · 544% of median 173 1.0
2000 8 2nd lowest of 11 · 20% of median 5 1.0
2002 11 3rd lowest of 11 · 27% of median 13 0.5
2014 73 7th lowest of 11 · 178% of median 107 1.2
2015 29 5th lowest of 11 · 71% of median 83 0.2
2016 3 1st lowest of 11 · 7% of median 16 0.1
2023 188 10th lowest of 11 · 458% of median 61 2.6
2024 41 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 36 0.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 574 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 5% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.