← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ART LINN SPRING NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 7201539 · 4 · BUZZARD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1938-06-011505th most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WINNIE SPRING (1989-11-16). Immediately behind: CRUM-JOHNSON LATERAL (1962-10-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
51134.322931938-06-011990-12-31 0.30.0 CIRRFIRDOMSTK

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 71 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 5 AF — 7% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 14 3rd lowest of 11 · 20% of median 29 0.2
2009 71 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 120 0.3
2010 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2011 36 5th lowest of 11 · 51% of median 62 0.3
2012 217 10th lowest of 11 · 306% of median 366 0.3
2013 207 9th lowest of 11 · 292% of median 349 0.3
2014 217 10th lowest of 11 · 306% of median 365 0.3
2015 181 8th lowest of 11 · 255% of median 304 0.3
2016 30 4th lowest of 11 · 42% of median 61 0.2
2017 86 7th lowest of 11 · 121% of median 167 0.3
2019 5 2nd lowest of 11 · 7% of median 12 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.