← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RIVER RANCH PUMP

Structure dossier · WDID 7201746 · 8 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2005-10-251923rd most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: VANDEGRIFT WELL (2005-09-30). Immediately behind: RIVER RANCH POND NO 1 (2005-10-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
56911.02005-10-252005-12-31 0.2680.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 28 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 71 AF — 249% of that, and 6th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 0 1st lowest of 8 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2006 11 2nd lowest of 8 · 39% of median 71 0.1
2007 28 4th lowest of 8 · 98% of median 180 0.1
2008 29 5th lowest of 8 · 102% of median 177 0.1
2011 24 3rd lowest of 8 · 84% of median 48 0.5
2013 73 7th lowest of 8 · 256% of median 171 0.2
2014 76 8th lowest of 8 · 267% of median 180 0.2
2019 71 6th lowest of 8 · 249% of median 171 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.