Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MARK AND DEE DEE'S LAKE
Structure dossier · WDID 7205352 · 2 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1993-08-01 — 1771st most senior of the 2166 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHANNON'S SPRING (1993-05-01). Immediately behind: HILTS WASTEWATER DITCH (1995-04-15).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54421.52443 | 1993-08-01 | 1999-12-31 | 0.0 | 100.0 | A | IRR | |
| 54421.54089 | 1998-02-02 | 1999-12-31 | 524.15 | 0.0 | A | RECFISSTKEVPWLD |
Recorded use (last 14 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 152 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 296 AF — 194% of that, and 12th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 60 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 39% of median | 31 | 1.0 |
| 2000 | 1,174 | 14th lowest of 14 · 770% of median | 306 | 3.5 |
| 2001 | 116 | 6th lowest of 14 · 76% of median | 217 | 0.3 |
| 2002 | 0 | 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median | 4 | 0.0 |
| 2003 | 86 | 5th lowest of 14 · 56% of median | 214 | 0.5 |
| 2004 | 76 | 4th lowest of 14 · 50% of median | 215 | 0.2 |
| 2005 | 157 | 8th lowest of 14 · 103% of median | 185 | 0.5 |
| 2006 | 148 | 7th lowest of 14 · 97% of median | 185 | 0.8 |
| 2007 | 272 | 11th lowest of 14 · 178% of median | 211 | 0.8 |
| 2008 | 298 | 13th lowest of 14 · 195% of median | 221 | 0.8 |
| 2009 | 223 | 10th lowest of 14 · 146% of median | 231 | 0.5 |
| 2010 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 7% of median | 12 | 0.6 |
| 2011 | 222 | 9th lowest of 14 · 146% of median | 189 | 0.6 |
| 2019 | 296 | 12th lowest of 14 · 194% of median | 200 | 0.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.