← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MEDINA DITCH NO 3
Structure dossier · WDID 7900545 · 1 · HUERFANO RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-06-01 — 23rd most senior of the 930 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MEDINA FELIPA DITCH (1867-06-01). Immediately behind: RAHN DITCH (MEDINA NO2) (1867-06-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6361.0 | 1867-06-01 | 1889-06-12 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 23 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 307 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 79 AF — 26% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 709 | 15th lowest of 15 · 231% of median | 167 | 3.6 |
| 1986 | 442 | 13th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 107 | 4.0 |
| 1987 | 540 | 14th lowest of 15 · 176% of median | 148 | 2.0 |
| 1988 | 421 | 10th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 128 | 2.0 |
| 1989 | 436 | 12th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 127 | 2.0 |
| 1990 | 252 | 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 132 | 2.2 |
| 1991 | 142 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 46% of median | 93 | 1.6 |
| 1992 | 307 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 165 | 1.0 |
| 1993 | 342 | 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 114 | 2.4 |
| 1994 | 282 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 159 | 1.0 |
| 1995 | 435 | 11th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 187 | 2.0 |
| 1996 | 71 | 1st lowest of 15 · 23% of median | 59 | 5.0 |
| 1997 | 231 | 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 129 | 1.0 |
| 1998 | 167 | 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 105 | 1.0 |
| 1999 | 79 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 26% of median | 52 | 3.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.