← My Water · Print / save as PDF
R L SMITH DITCH NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 7900559 · 1 · HUERFANO RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1868-04-10 — 33rd most senior of the 930 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MARTINEZ DITCH (1868-04-10). Immediately behind: CENTER DITCH (1868-04-18).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6675.0 | 1868-04-10 | 1889-06-12 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 26 |
| 13881.0 | 1888-01-02 | 1889-06-12 | 2.2 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 92 |
| 16557.0 | 1895-05-01 | 1898-02-23 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 19416.0 | 1903-02-28 | 1921-10-03 | 1.2 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 315 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 129 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 209 AF — 162% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 17 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 13% of median | 51 | 0.6 |
| 2012 | 31 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 56 | 0.6 |
| 2013 | 10 | 1st lowest of 15 · 8% of median | 26 | 1.0 |
| 2014 | 129 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 81 | 2.7 |
| 2015 | 464 | 15th lowest of 15 · 360% of median | 153 | 5.6 |
| 2016 | 353 | 13th lowest of 15 · 274% of median | 151 | 3.7 |
| 2017 | 409 | 14th lowest of 15 · 317% of median | 216 | 2.7 |
| 2018 | 35 | 4th lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 60 | 0.7 |
| 2019 | 344 | 12th lowest of 15 · 267% of median | 191 | 3.0 |
| 2020 | 64 | 6th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 109 | 0.7 |
| 2021 | 225 | 10th lowest of 15 · 174% of median | 149 | 2.9 |
| 2022 | 118 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 105 | 1.9 |
| 2023 | 44 | 5th lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 49 | 0.6 |
| 2024 | 264 | 11th lowest of 15 · 205% of median | 167 | 1.4 |
| 2025 | 209 | 9th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 144 | 1.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.