← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CALAHAN DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 8000751 · DITCH · GIBBS GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (0576005) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at CANAL 3 DITCH (CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER, priority 1870-04-01).
● Fully called out — call at BIG T PLATTE R DITCH (BIG THOMPSON RIVER, priority 1865-11-18).
● Fully called out — call at B H EATON DITCH (CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER, priority 1864-06-09).
● Fully called out — call at LAST CHANCE DITCH 2 (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1863-12-30).
● Fully called out — call at HILLSBOROUGH DITCH (BIG THOMPSON RIVER, priority 1861-11-10).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-05-01 — 729th most senior of the 21881 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 2302432 (1887-05-01). Immediately behind: 8001553 (1887-05-31).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13635.0 | 1887-05-01 | 1913-05-22 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 13879.0 | 1887-12-31 | 1913-05-22 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTK |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 17 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 19 AF — 112% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 24 | 12th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 25 | 0.5 |
| 1988 | 8 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 47% of median | 17 | 0.2 |
| 1995 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 11 | 0.5 |
| 1996 | 41 | 13th lowest of 15 · 241% of median | 46 | 0.5 |
| 1997 | 118 | 15th lowest of 15 · 694% of median | 81 | 0.8 |
| 1999 | 93 | 14th lowest of 15 · 547% of median | 174 | 0.8 |
| 2000 | 15 | 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 16 | 0.5 |
| 2008 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 59% of median | 6 | 1.0 |
| 2010 | 12 | 6th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 32 | 0.2 |
| 2011 | 20 | 10th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 82 | 0.1 |
| 2013 | 3 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 13 | 0.1 |
| 2014 | 17 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 70 | 0.1 |
| 2016 | 22 | 11th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 41 | 1.5 |
| 2017 | 1 | 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median | 6 | 0.1 |
| 2019 | 19 | 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 61 | 0.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.