← Basin groundwater

6995 IMBODEN HOLDINGS LLC

Monitored well · 151094 · Division 1 · Water District 1

Its well permit here · Well permit at DWR ↗

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR well record ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR permit record ↗

Unclassified

No aquifer or designated-basin assignment — administrative world unknown, kept out of recharge math.

Water-level record

No water-level measurements are cached for this well. It is in the well inventory — permit, construction and aquifer below — but nobody has logged a level we hold.

Geophysical log

DWR holds a geophysical log for this well, run 2017-04-24 (gamma, resistivity, spontaneous_potential). DWR's log page.

Curves digitized from the scan

Hydrohistorian traced the scanned log automatically. 1 curve passed the confidence gate; 7 did not and are listed with the reason. Screening data: the scan stays the record.

CurveInterval ftCoverageVerdict Curves like this one scored
64" Normal Resistivity (Ohm-m) 10–383 77% not used: ambiguous rows 24%; scale OCR confidence 0.72
80252-F_ELog_Main.hed (MAIN PASS) (CPS) 10–383 90% not used: scale OCR confidence 0.79; curve name not recognized: '80252-F_ELog_Main.hed (MAIN PASS)'
Single-Point Resistance (Ohm) 10–383 77% pass r 0.99 median, error 0.6% of scale, 6% below r 0.8 (n 49) LAS
Spontaneous Potential (mV) 10–383 95% not used: ambiguous rows 7%; SP: the printed scale is a span with an unknown offset, and the benchmark could not verify the shape (median r 0.28 after offset removal)
Ohm (Ohm) 1–183 5% not used: coverage 6%; ambiguous rows 9%; curve name not recognized: 'Ohm'
mV (mV) 1–183 100% not used: curve name not recognized: 'mV'
Ohm (Ohm) 200–383 13% not used: coverage 13%; ambiguous rows 52%; curve name not recognized: 'Ohm'
mV (mV) 200–383 91% not used: curve name not recognized: 'mV'

"Curves like this one" is the benchmark row for this curve's class: curves of the same name traced the same way, scored against DWR's own digital log of the same run. r is correlation (the print's own smoothing allowed for); error is mean absolute error as a share of the track's printed range; "below r 0.8" is the share of passing curves in the class that still disagreed with DWR's log, which this curve's own numbers cannot rule out.

The LAS files and every verdict are in the statewide groundwater release (/data, table gw_digitized); the MCP server's gw_digitized_curves and gw_net_sand work from them. How well the tracer does was measured against DWR's own digital logs.

The well itself

Total depth685.0 ft
Perforated interval600.0–685.0 ft
Ground elevation5365.0 ft
Permit79556
Location39.82000, -104.58000
What this page is not

Monitoring records are irregular: measurements cluster where somebody chose to look, so a trend describes this well's record, not the aquifer as a whole. Levels are DWR's published measurements, unedited. A trend here is not a prediction, and it is not a determination about anyone's water right.