← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ECCV AUG SOUTH PLATTE EMPIRE TO BIJOU IM

Structure dossier · WDID 0102858 · R · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2009-12-316121st most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MEADOW SPRINGS RANCH WELL B (2009-12-30). Immediately behind: YOCAM POND 2 (1963-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
58439.02009-12-312009-12-31 0.00.0 CMUNAUGCUR

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 672 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 2,456 AF — 366% of that, and 11th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 6 1st lowest of 13 · 1% of median 4 1.2
2013 2,084 10th lowest of 13 · 310% of median 135 13.9
2014 487 5th lowest of 13 · 72% of median 51 9.5
2015 20 2nd lowest of 13 · 3% of median 5 3.1
2016 672 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 101 5.0
2017 558 6th lowest of 13 · 83% of median 124 3.2
2018 1,832 9th lowest of 13 · 273% of median 186 10.1
2019 2,593 12th lowest of 13 · 386% of median 199 17.8
2020 3,199 13th lowest of 13 · 476% of median 203 17.6
2021 415 4th lowest of 13 · 62% of median 123 9.6
2022 399 3rd lowest of 13 · 59% of median 156 3.3
2023 798 8th lowest of 13 · 119% of median 120 10.0
2024 2,456 11th lowest of 13 · 366% of median 214 14.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1621 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 62% of the irrigation seasons in 2012-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.