← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WIGGINS FARMS RECHARGE W 2 59918-F

Structure dossier · WDID 0109887 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2003-08-015958th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WIGGINS FARMS RECHARGE W 3 59901-F HGW (2003-08-01). Immediately behind: WIGGINS FARMS RECHARGE W 1 59501-F HGW (2003-08-16).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
58074.560952003-08-012009-12-31 3.3420.0 CAUGRCH
58925.02011-05-012009-12-31 0.27180.8422 CAUGRCH

Recorded use (last 6 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 404 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 360 AF — 89% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 6 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 448 4th lowest of 6 · 111% of median 145 4.3
2010 837 5th lowest of 6 · 207% of median 267 7.4
2011 919 6th lowest of 6 · 228% of median 241 8.7
2012 346 2nd lowest of 6 · 86% of median 142 2.8
2013 106 1st lowest of 6 · 26% of median 52 2.7
2023 360 3rd lowest of 6 · 89% of median 65 3.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 912 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 30% of the irrigation seasons in 2009-2023 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.