← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WILLIAM CALLOWAY DITCH 1
Structure dossier · WDID 0300995 · 1 · NORTH FORK CACHE LA POUD · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:32 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1871-05-01 — 110th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BURNHAM EMERSON DITCH (1871-04-01). Immediately behind: CHAFFEE DITCH (1872-03-10).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7791.0 | 1871-05-01 | 1882-04-11 | 17.05 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 42 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2012, came in at 51 AF — 121% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 464 | 15th lowest of 15 · 1105% of median | 80 | 3.0 |
| 1982 | 244 | 13th lowest of 15 · 581% of median | 51 | 3.0 |
| 1984 | 175 | 12th lowest of 15 · 417% of median | 31 | 5.0 |
| 1985 | 42 | 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 14 | 3.0 |
| 1986 | 42 | 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 8 | 3.0 |
| 1987 | 32 | 4th lowest of 15 · 76% of median | 5 | 4.0 |
| 1988 | 329 | 14th lowest of 15 · 783% of median | 64 | 3.0 |
| 1989 | 54 | 10th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 29 | 1.0 |
| 1990 | 118 | 11th lowest of 15 · 281% of median | 30 | 2.5 |
| 1992 | 36 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 8 | 3.0 |
| 1993 | 5 | 1st lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 3 | 1.8 |
| 1994 | 16 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 38% of median | 6 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 20 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 6 | 2.0 |
| 2000 | 42 | 6th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 16 | 2.0 |
| 2012 | 51 | 9th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 8 | 5.9 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.