← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOULDER POWER PL

Structure dossier · WDID 0600514 · PIPELINE · BOULDER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no call in the record verifiably applies to this district (statements and caller locations checked).

Where it sits in line

Priority 1905-09-09184th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0600561 (1904-12-20). Immediately behind: 0604237 (1905-09-22).

On MAINSTEM at river mile 0.0, it is 1st of 78 down the reach. Nothing modelled upstream of it on this reach. Immediately downstream: SILVER LAKE DITCH.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20340.01905-09-091907-03-13 110.00.0 CIRRCOMIND

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 7,195 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 4,847 AF — 67% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 7,968 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 215 40.0
2010 7,100 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 246 35.0
2011 9,909 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 283 38.2
2012 4,507 1st lowest of 15 · 63% of median 149 30.0
2013 10,386 14th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 200 45.0
2014 13,105 15th lowest of 15 · 182% of median 285 41.4
2015 5,170 3rd lowest of 15 · 72% of median 284 46.5
2016 8,929 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 215 40.9
2017 8,539 10th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 177 40.8
2018 6,868 5th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 179 33.9
2019 7,195 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 176 43.2
2020 8,637 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 217 44.0
2021 6,386 4th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 165 37.6
2022 6,952 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 149 35.1
2023 4,847 2nd lowest of 15 · 67% of median 178 26.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.