← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DRY CREEK DAVIDSON DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0600569 · DITCH · SOUTH BOULDER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1863-05-01 — 74th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COTTONWOOD DITCH 2 (1863-04-15). Immediately behind: 0602417 (1863-05-01).
On SOUTH BOULDER CREEK at river mile 17.3, it is 39th of 58 down the reach. Immediately upstream: HUNTER/HINE POND. Immediately downstream: BURKES RES 1.
Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4869.0 | 1863-05-01 | 1882-06-02 | 16.748 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,406 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 134 AF — 10% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1,984 | 15th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 113 | 15.7 |
| 2009 | 1,335 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 99 | 12.4 |
| 2010 | 1,226 | 6th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 86 | 14.6 |
| 2011 | 1,946 | 13th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | 116 | 12.0 |
| 2012 | 1,604 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 106 | 13.3 |
| 2013 | 1,953 | 14th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | 107 | 16.7 |
| 2014 | 1,483 | 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 140 | 9.7 |
| 2015 | 469 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 33% of median | 64 | 5.7 |
| 2016 | 970 | 5th lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 69 | 13.2 |
| 2017 | 1,750 | 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 106 | 17.7 |
| 2018 | 880 | 4th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 72 | 12.6 |
| 2019 | 1,482 | 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | 98 | 12.0 |
| 2020 | 1,406 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 87 | 14.5 |
| 2021 | 584 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 53 | 10.0 |
| 2025 | 134 | 1st lowest of 15 · 10% of median | 16 | 6.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.