← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MIDDLE SHAW LAKE NO 2

Structure dossier · WDID 0603368 · RESERVOIR · IDAHO CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:42 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (96d5528) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: no administrative call record for this basin.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1986-04-301829th most senior of the 1867 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHAW LAKES DIVERSION 2 (1986-04-30). Immediately behind: NORTH SHAW LAKE NO 3 (1986-04-30).

On IDAHO CREEK at river mile 22.0, it is 1st of 7 down the reach. Nothing modelled upstream of it on this reach. Immediately downstream: SHAW LAKES DIVERSION 1.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
55882.497931986-04-302003-12-31 22.7100.2 AIRRINDRECFISFIRSTKAUGWLD

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 37 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 57 AF — 154% of that, and 10th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 32 5th lowest of 11 · 86% of median 4 10.0
2014 46 8th lowest of 11 · 124% of median 12 3.1
2015 21 3rd lowest of 11 · 57% of median 7 2.1
2016 48 9th lowest of 11 · 130% of median 13 4.0
2017 70 11th lowest of 11 · 189% of median 17 7.5
2018 20 2nd lowest of 11 · 54% of median 8 2.0
2019 37 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 9 5.3
2020 44 7th lowest of 11 · 119% of median 13 3.1
2021 21 3rd lowest of 11 · 57% of median 14 2.4
2023 8 1st lowest of 11 · 22% of median 3 1.7
2024 57 10th lowest of 11 · 154% of median 20 2.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.