Hydrohistorian
Log in

← My Water  ·  All reservoirs in this district  ·  Print / save as PDF  · 

 ·  every download of this record carries its certificate id

KINGFISHER LAKE C702

Structure dossier · WDID 0904297 · RESERVOIR · TURKEY CREEK · DWR record

Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-10-12 23:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260928 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (dd58e60) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

The record and the river

Download this structure

Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.

⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF

Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv

What is in the bundle
  • rights.csv — every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.
  • annual_use.csv — recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.
  • curtailment_now.csv — each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.
  • court_cases.csv — the cases attached to its rights.
  • co_parties.csv — the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.
  • call_climatology.csv — how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.
  • README.txt — provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at PIONEER UNION DITCH (BEAR CREEK, priority 1861-12-10).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

The outlook for the weeks ahead is not computable for this structure: no gage record for this year at this date, so there is nothing to find analogs for. Today’s position is a separate question, and it is answered in Current administration above — that screen reads the district’s active calls and needs no reference gage.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1955-03-15 — 1261st most senior of the 2058 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WOODRING RES 1 (1953-10-07). Immediately behind: ARCHER SPRING WELL (1956-07-31).

On TURKEY CREEK at river mile 32.6, it is 9th of 21 down the reach. Immediately upstream: WILLOW SPRINGS RES C1081. Immediately downstream: BERGEN NO 1 WEST RES.

Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. Alt-pointAn absolute amount decreed at another structure that may be diverted here instead -- an alternate point of diversion or an exchange. DWR calls this the APEX amount; a right showing 0.0 absolute but an alt-point amount is exercised here under another structure's decree. Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45290.38424 1955-03-151974-12-31 108.0 AF 0.0 — Irrigation, Municipal +4 W7589
55696.00000 2002-06-282002-12-31 18.1 AF 131.9 AF — Irrigation, Recreation +2 02CW0138, 19CW3233

Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.

Water-court filings naming this structure

2 applications in the monthly water-court resumes explicitly reference this WDID. The resume is the earliest public notice of a new claim (C.R.S. 37-92-302) — years before anything reaches the decree record below. Most applications name structures by name rather than WDID, so absence here is weak evidence of absence.

MonthCaseWhat it asksOppose byExcerpt
2026-07 2026CW3112 reasonable diligence closed 2026-09-30 CASE NUMBER 2026CW3112 (2019CW3233, 2013CW3067, 2002CW138) APPLICATION FOR FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE IN JEFFERSON COUNTY. RED ROCKS COUNTRY CLUB c/o Richard J. Mehren, Cameron J. Abatti, Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison …
2026-06 2026CW3094 reasonable diligence closed 2026-08-31 CASE NUMBER 2026CW3094 (2019CW3219, 2009CW071) APPLICATION FOR FINDING OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE IN JEFFERSON AND DENVER COUNTIES . RED ROCKS COUNTRY CLUB c/o Richard J. Mehren, Cameron J. Abatti, Moses, Wittemyer, Harriso…

Source: Judicial Branch combined monthly resumes (archive), indexed nightly; WDIDs attached only when a 7-digit token in the filing matches DWR’s structure inventory.

How often is it out of priority?

Across the 11 seasons whose call record is complete enough to judge this structure (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026), week by week from April.

most senior right · admin 45290.38424 · peaks at 11 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep
most junior right · admin 55696.00000 · peaks at 11 of 11 seasons
AprMayJunJulAugSep

Snow sets the clock here. In the driest third of snow years (3 seasons), 2 seasons stayed under call throughout and 0 ended free. In the middle third (5 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 24 (June 10 to July 15 across those years); in 1 of them it never lifted at all. In the wettest third (3 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 3 (May 20 to July 8 across those years).

Snow years ranked by the district’s April 1 snow-water percentile across 1 SNOTEL site; 11 seasons carry both a snow reading and a judgeable call record. How the past played out, not a forecast.

Why only 11 seasons, and what the bars mean

Each bar is one week: how many of those seasons that right was out of priority under a call this site can lawfully attribute to this structure. Green is never, red is every season on record.

The short record is a property of DWR's data, not of the river. A call only counts against a structure when we can establish it applies — by the districts named in its set comments, or by stream mile on the same source. DWR did not begin stating affected districts routinely until about 2015: fewer than one call in ten can be judged before then, against roughly two in three since. A season we cannot judge is not a season without calls, so it is dropped rather than counted as quiet — 12 seasons dropped here.

This is a frequency over past seasons, not a forecast. It says nothing about what the division engineer will do this year.

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 153 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1987, came in at 177 AF — 116% of that, and 8th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 65 3rd lowest of 13 · 42% of median — 32 10.0
1976 177 8th lowest of 13 · 116% of median — 72 3.0
1977 123 6th lowest of 13 · 80% of median — 53 2.0
1978 93 4th lowest of 13 · 61% of median — 32 2.0
1979 180 10th lowest of 13 · 118% of median — 55 5.0
1980 230 11th lowest of 13 · 150% of median — 66 8.0
1981 121 5th lowest of 13 · 79% of median — 62 1.0
1982 153 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median — 92 1.0
1983 50 2nd lowest of 13 · 33% of median — 26 1.0
1984 16 1st lowest of 13 · 10% of median — 9 1.0
1985 252 12th lowest of 13 · 165% of median — 100 5.0
1986 319 13th lowest of 13 · 208% of median — 84 8.0
1987 177 8th lowest of 13 · 116% of median — 62 5.0
1988 — no recorded volume 129 0 —

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record stale 745 measured days, but newest is 13853 day(s) before the data's end (target 450)
record continuity sparse 26% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-1988 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.

Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.