← My Water · All reservoirs in this district · Print / save as PDF ·
· every download of this record carries its certificate idBERGEN NO 1 WEST RES
Structure dossier · WDID 0904274 · RESERVOIR · TURKEY CREEK · DWR record
Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-10-12 16:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260928 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (dd58e60) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Who owns it
- Bergen Ditch & Reservoir Company (private) — as reported to the National Inventory of Dams (USACE) ↗.
DWR’s own records name no owner for a ditch, reservoir or well, so this comes from the source shown and can be out of date. Organisations only: a private landowner’s name is never listed.
The record and the river
Where this structure is measured
| Gage | Flowing now | Record | How we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| BERGEN #1 WEST RESERVOIR INFLOW 0904274A | 0.0 cfs | 2022–2026, 1,495 days | DWR telemetry mapping |
A green link is DWR's own: either its telemetry inventory maps this WDID to that station, or the station is named for this WDID (0700553 → 0700553A). An amber one is ours — the station sits within 250 m and shares a distinctive word with this structure's name, which is a strong hint rather than a DWR statement that this gage meters this structure. Wrong? Tell us.
Flowing now
0.0 cfs as of 2026-10-12 13:15 (3.6 h ago)
Zero is a real reading: the gage is reporting, and it says this structure is not diverting right now.
Provisional 15-minute telemetry from 0904274A ↗ (BERGEN #1 WEST RESERVOIR INFLOW). Raw, not the approved record — it is never merged into the diversion history below. DWR publishes the official diversion record after the water year closes and is approved, which is why that record ends months back while this reads minutes ago.
In short
BERGEN NO 1 WEST RES holds 3 decreed rights on TURKEY CREEK. A call at PIONEER UNION DITCH on BEAR CREEK (1861-12-10) currently reaches it: fully called out. 7 further calls state no district and sit outside this one, so they are counted here rather than assumed either way. That is today's position; the weeks ahead cannot be projected for it: no gage record for this year at this date, so there is nothing to find analogs for. In a median year over its last 14 recorded years it diverts 312 acre-feet. It was a party to 2 court cases that also touched 10 other structures.
Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (8 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.
Download this structure
Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.
⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF
Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv
What is in the bundle
rights.csv— every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.annual_use.csv— recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.curtailment_now.csv— each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.court_cases.csv— the cases attached to its rights.co_parties.csv— the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.call_climatology.csv— how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.README.txt— provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Dam safety
| Dam | BERGEN EAST (completed 1874) |
|---|---|
| Hazard class | High |
| Condition at last inspection | Satisfactory (2026-03-24) |
| Storage restriction | None on file |
| Normal storage | 706 AF |
| Physical status | Active |
| Emergency action plan | Yes |
Source: DWR Dam Safety’s jurisdictional-dam inventory
(damsafety/damsafetydaminfojd), refreshed weekly.
Joined on this structure’s own WDID as DWR
records it on the dam. Hazard class describes the
consequence of failure, not the likelihood of it.
DWR’s dam record.
Current administration
● Fully called out — call at PIONEER UNION DITCH (BEAR CREEK, priority 1861-12-10).
Which of its rights are out of priority?
The outlook for the weeks ahead is not computable for this structure: no gage record for this year at this date, so there is nothing to find analogs for. Today’s position is a separate question, and it is answered in Current administration above — that screen reads the district’s active calls and needs no reference gage.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1874-05-01 — 115th most senior of the 2058 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 0903689 (1874-05-01). Immediately behind: BERGEN NO 2 EAST RES (1874-05-01).
On TURKEY CREEK at river mile 33.5, it is 10th of 21 down the reach. Immediately upstream: KINGFISHER LAKE C702. Immediately downstream: DEANE RES.
Position on the modelled network, not a claim about whose water this is — a stream carries water from many rights at once, and diverted water returns to it.
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Alt-pointAn absolute amount decreed at another structure that may be diverted here instead -- an alternate point of diversion or an exchange. DWR calls this the APEX amount; a right showing 0.0 absolute but an alt-point amount is exercised here under another structure's decree. | Decreed forWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8887.00000 | 1874-05-01 | 1884-02-04 | 157.5 AF | 0.0 | — | Irrigation | 82CW0476, CA6832 |
| 12479.00000 | 1884-03-01 | 1935-09-24 | 89.04 AF | 0.0 | — | Irrigation | CA91471, 82CW0476 |
| 61342.00000 | 2017-12-12 | 2017-12-31 | 0.0 AF | 0.0 | 35.3 AF | Irrigation, Recreation +1 | 17CW3192 |
Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.
Legal record & documents
5 decreed actions on record across
4 court cases:
17CW3192, CA91471, 82CW0476, CA6832.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
17CW3192 | 1 | 2017-12-31 | S |
CA91471 | 1 | 1935-09-24 | S |
82CW0476 | 2 | 1935-09-24 | O, S |
CA6832 | 1 | 1884-02-04 | O |
28 imaged documents on DWR’s shelf for this structure — 28 water-court documents across 7 cases, including 7 decrees. Every row opens the scanned PDF at DWR. Listing as of 2026-10-02.
- Decree in case 17CW3192 ↗ · imaged 2019-06-17 · 10 pages
- Decree in case 06CW0155 ↗ · imaged 2007-08-31 · 1 page
- Decree in case CA6832 ↗ · imaged 2007-02-05 · 102 pages
- Decree in case 94CW0243 ↗ · imaged 2006-09-25 · 7 pages
- Decree in case 95CW0031 ↗ · imaged 2006-09-25 · 23 pages
- Decree in case CA91471 ↗ · imaged 2006-08-30 · 246 pages
- Decree in case 82CW0476 ↗ · imaged 2005-08-24 · 20 pages
“Imaged” is the date DWR’s archive filed the scan, which is often years after the court acted (a 1911 decree can be imaged in 2011). The court’s own date is the adjudication date in the rights table.
Court record (28)
| Imaged | Case | Type | Pages | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-11 | 17CW3192 |
NOTICE (DISMISSAL, ETC) | 1 | open ↗ |
| 2019-06-17 | 17CW3192 |
DECREE | 10 | open ↗ |
| 2019-05-16 | 17CW3192 |
REFEREE'S RULING | 10 | open ↗ |
| 2018-04-16 | 17CW3192 |
SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION | 3 | open ↗ |
| 2018-01-09 | 17CW3192 |
APPLICATION | 6 | open ↗ |
| 2009-10-19 | 95CW0031 |
PROTEST TO REFEREE RULING | 2 | open ↗ |
| 2009-10-19 | 95CW0031 |
STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION | 18 | open ↗ |
| 2009-10-19 | 95CW0031 |
SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION | 3 | open ↗ |
| 2009-10-16 | 94CW0243 |
STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION | 16 | open ↗ |
| 2009-10-16 | 94CW0243 |
SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION | 2 | open ↗ |
| 2007-08-31 | 06CW0155 |
DECREE | 1 | open ↗ |
| 2007-08-10 | 06CW0155 |
REFEREE'S RULING | 11 | open ↗ |
| 2007-05-03 | 06CW0155 |
AFFIDAVIT | 3 | open ↗ |
| 2007-05-03 | 06CW0155 |
OTHER | 2 | open ↗ |
| 2007-02-05 | CA6832 |
DECREE | 102 | open ↗ |
| 2006-10-13 | 94CW0243 |
APPLICATION | 7 | open ↗ |
| 2006-10-13 | 95CW0031 |
APPLICATION | 19 | open ↗ |
| 2006-09-25 | 94CW0243 |
DECREE | 7 | open ↗ |
| 2006-09-25 | 95CW0031 |
DECREE | 23 | open ↗ |
| 2006-09-11 | 06CW0155 |
SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION | 2 | open ↗ |
| 2006-08-30 | CA91471 |
DECREE | 246 | open ↗ |
| 2006-07-05 | 06CW0155 |
APPLICATION | 9 | open ↗ |
| 2006-05-01 | CA6832 |
ORDER (OTHER) | 2 | open ↗ |
| 2005-08-24 | 82CW0476 |
APPLICATION | 8 | open ↗ |
| 2005-08-24 | 82CW0476 |
DECREE | 20 | open ↗ |
| 2005-08-24 | 82CW0476 |
ORDER (OTHER) | 8 | open ↗ |
| 2005-08-24 | 82CW0476 |
OTHER | 3 | open ↗ |
| 2005-08-24 | 82CW0476 |
STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION | 36 | open ↗ |
Imaged documents at DWR. DWR keeps the scanned documents for this structure — decrees, rulings, plats, correspondence — in its Laserfiche archive. Open the list directly: imaged documents for 0904274 ↗ (indexed by structure, not by case — the cases listed above appear within the list).
Other DWR records for this structure: DWR’s page for this structure ↗ — net amounts, water rights, transactions & adjudication history, and diversion records, all on that one page. On this site: the district’s full legal picture →
How often is it out of priority?
Across the 11 seasons whose call record is complete enough to judge this structure (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026), week by week from April.
8887.00000 · peaks at
10 of 11 seasons
12479.00000 · peaks at
11 of 11 seasons
61342.00000 · peaks at
11 of 11 seasons
Snow sets the clock here. In the driest third of snow years (3 seasons), 2 seasons stayed under call throughout and 0 ended free. In the middle third (5 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 24 (June 10 to July 15 across those years); in 1 of them it never lifted at all. In the wettest third (3 seasons), the call settled in for the season around June 3 (May 20 to July 8 across those years).
Snow years ranked by the district’s April 1 snow-water percentile across 1 SNOTEL site; 11 seasons carry both a snow reading and a judgeable call record. How the past played out, not a forecast.
Why only 11 seasons, and what the bars mean
Each bar is one week: how many of those seasons that right was out of priority under a call this site can lawfully attribute to this structure. Green is never, red is every season on record.
The short record is a property of DWR's data, not of the river. A call only counts against a structure when we can establish it applies — by the districts named in its set comments, or by stream mile on the same source. DWR did not begin stating affected districts routinely until about 2015: fewer than one call in ten can be judged before then, against roughly two in three since. A season we cannot judge is not a season without calls, so it is dropped rather than counted as quiet — 12 seasons dropped here.
This is a frequency over past seasons, not a forecast. It says nothing about what the division engineer will do this year.
Structures it shares court cases with
This structure was a party to 2 court cases that also touched 10 other structures — changes of water right, augmentation plans, exchanges. Being parties to the same case does not by itself mean water moved between them; which way it ran, and how much, is in the decree.
| Case | Filed | Also touched |
|---|---|---|
17CW3192 |
2017 | BERGEN NO 2 EAST RES, DEANE RES |
82CW0476 |
1982 | BERGEN DITCH, BERGEN DITCH WEAVER CR, 0903687, 0903688 and 6 more |
Also a party to 2 omnibus
adjudications
(CA91471, 503 structures; CA6832, 29 structures).
Those settled many rights at once and are listed separately: they say
these structures were adjudicated together, not that they deal with
each other.
How this is derived
Every court action DWR records for a structure
carries its case number. Where one case number appears in the records of
several structures, those structures were parties to the same proceeding.
This is read straight from the cached transaction tables — no
document was interpreted to build it. Case numbers are validated against
the known Colorado formats first: the case column also contains stray
dates (10/04/1884 appears on 98 Clear Creek rows), and
treating one as a case number would invent a shared proceeding between
60 unrelated structures. Cases spanning more than
12 structures are separated out as omnibus
adjudications. The filing year comes from the case number, not from the
row's adjudication date — that date belongs to the water right the
action describes, so a 2006 case legitimately carries a 1989 date.
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 312 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 316 AF — 101% of that, and 9th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 140 | 1st lowest of 14 · 45% of median | — | 67 | 4.8 |
| 2009 | 266 | 5th lowest of 14 · 85% of median | 442 | 55 | 15.1 |
| 2010 | 267 | 6th lowest of 14 · 86% of median | 209 | 17 | 10.4 |
| 2011 | 489 | 14th lowest of 14 · 157% of median | 488 | 76 | 10.2 |
| 2012 | 363 | 11th lowest of 14 · 116% of median | — | 65 | 6.1 |
| 2013 | — | no recorded volume | 15 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 381 | 12th lowest of 14 · 122% of median | — | 66 | 5.7 |
| 2018 | 418 | 13th lowest of 14 · 134% of median | — | 68 | 11.6 |
| 2019 | 347 | 10th lowest of 14 · 111% of median | — | 24 | 11.2 |
| 2020 | 220 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 70% of median | 40 | 13 | 13.6 |
| 2021 | 315 | 8th lowest of 14 · 101% of median | 188 | 24 | 9.1 |
| 2022 | 309 | 7th lowest of 14 · 99% of median | 91 | 34 | 8.1 |
| 2023 | 218 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 70% of median | 124 | 24 | 12.2 |
| 2024 | 247 | 4th lowest of 14 · 79% of median | 127 | 18 | 15.0 |
| 2025 | 316 | 9th lowest of 14 · 101% of median | 43 | 39 | 8.8 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 14 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
Its reference gage, Bergen #1 West Reservoir Inflow: no clear flow trend.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | current | 2028 measured days, newest 331 day(s) before the data's end (DWR publishes ~1 year in arrears) |
| record continuity | sparse | 19% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.
Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.