← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH CATAMOUNT CREEK

Structure dossier · WDID 1000575 · 7 · NORTH CATAMOUNT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:47 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-12-3119th most senior of the 2864 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STUBBS & MILLER DITCH (1861-12-31). Immediately behind: SOUTH CATAMOUNT CREEK DIVERSION (1861-12-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4383.01861-12-311882-03-06 2.9050.0 CMUN 6
4780.01863-02-011882-03-06 4.00.0 CMUN 11

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 481 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 552 AF — 115% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 307 2nd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 365 8.2
2012 444 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 366 13.2
2013 404 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 363 12.2
2014 295 1st lowest of 15 · 61% of median 365 19.5
2015 1,029 13th lowest of 15 · 214% of median 365 13.2
2016 1,131 14th lowest of 15 · 235% of median 366 12.8
2017 481 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 333 8.8
2018 388 4th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 365 10.0
2019 495 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 365 8.6
2020 325 3rd lowest of 15 · 68% of median 365 12.6
2021 566 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 365 10.3
2022 531 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 365 11.4
2023 404 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 365 8.8
2024 1,252 15th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 366 12.5
2025 552 11th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 304 19.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.